Skip navigation

Monthly Archives: July 2010

‘….a Dutch organization recently estimated that the total amount of unused things in attics, cellars and sheds add up to about nine billion euros worth in the Netherlands alone’ (Hinte, Ev 2004, Eternally yours: time in design : product value sustenance, 010 Publshers, Rotterdam.)

Through my research, I have discovered that consumers have a different understanding then designers about their personal objects. Consumers tend to be unable to accurately define the life span of their objects (how long before they need to change their object or throw them way). This is due to the fact that consumers are lacking the required information’s to make the educated choice. T he reasoning behind this is that consumers know their objects will loose their interest, or a better alternative will soon be available. How can we maintain consumer value over the life span of an object? The question is how can we as designers educate the consumers about the life span of objects? Should we take inspiration from the food industry and add expiration date tags on objects?

When asked to a consumer how to increase the life span of certain objects the most recurrent answer was to improve the materials selection. This was surprising when often the material selection would be good to make the object last a multiple generations. Also the consumer would tend to give shorter life spans to the objects then design educated people. In conclusion why do we design objects to last for generations, when the consumer is unable to understand why objects have the life span they have ?

It is becoming obvious that designers are required to discover a manner to educate their consumers on the life span of objects.

A few considerations:

Adding an expiration date tag on objects to enable the consumer to realise how long the actual object as been designed to last.

For a monthly fee consumer could pay to help discarded objects regain a life. This would create an understanding with consumers that sometime their object could actually last a little longer with them.

Sharing ownership of objects, with a combination of service design. This would push companies to ensure that the objects are in condition, thus greater chance for them to last longer.

The research that I am working on is based on understanding why certain objects last longer in use then others; ‘Why are objects cherished even after their functionality as passed’ As designers we have a verity of tools to design longer life spans for our objects of conception. The question is what actually makes you (our clients) keep your objects longer, give them the life span you give them (why do you discard your personal objects?)? Will the answers you give me relate to what as designers try to achieve, or will it be entirely different? Will it push us as designers to question our approach to design sustainable conception?

The aim of this research is to understand how as designers can we produce ‘better’, longer lasting, and more enjoyable design/objects. I am interested in producing design solutions that will make you (my clients) more attached to my designs, and at the same time design for a more sustainable world (a ‘green’ design approach), where we do not need to change our possessions at every new fashion.

Please if you could answer the following questionnaire, and send to the following email address claudeldissertation@gmail.com. I thank you all in advance to the contribution you will do to my research!!

questionnairecomputer

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.